All contained radiocarbon.2 Further, analyses of fossilized wood and coal samples, supposedly spanning 32–350 million years in age, yielded ages between 20,000 and 50,000 years using carbon-14 dating.3 Diamonds supposedly 1–3 billion years old similarly yielded carbon-14 ages of only 55,000 years.4 A sea creature, called an ammonite, was discovered near Redding, California, accompanied by fossilized wood.Both fossils are claimed by strata dating to be 112–120 million years old but yielded radiocarbon ages of only thousands of years.Even that is too old when you realize that these ages assume that the earth’s magnetic field has always been constant.

seduction and dating com - Carbon 14 the radioactive nuclide used in dating fossils has

Carbon-14 (or radiocarbon) is a radioactive form of carbon that scientists use to date fossils.

But it decays so quickly—with a half-life of only 5,730 years—that none is expected to remain in fossils after only a few hundred thousand years.

Yet carbon-14 has been detected in “ancient” fossils—supposedly up to hundreds of millions of years old—ever since the earliest days of radiocarbon dating.1 Even if every atom in the whole earth were carbon-14, they would decay so quickly that no carbon-14 would be left on earth after only 1 million years.

Contrary to expectations, between 19 alone, the scientific literature reported carbon-14 in 70 samples that came from fossils, coal, oil, natural gas, and marble representing the fossil-bearing portion of the geologic record, supposedly spanning more than 500 million years.

As a result, past creatures had much less radiocarbon in their bodies, and their deaths occurred much more recently than reported!

So the radiocarbon ages of all fossils and coal should be reduced to less than 5,000 years, matching the timing of their burial during the Flood.

The age of diamonds should be reduced to the approximate time of biblical creation—about 6,000 years ago.5 Old-earth advocates repeat the same two hackneyed defenses, even though they were resoundingly demolished years ago.

The first cry is, “It’s all contamination.” Yet for thirty years AMS radiocarbon laboratories have subjected all samples, before they carbon-14 date them, to repeated brutal treatments with strong acids and bleaches to rid them of all contamination.6 And when the instruments are tested with blank samples, they yield zero radiocarbon, so there can’t be any contamination or instrument problems.

The second cry is, “New radiocarbon was formed directly in the fossils when nearby decaying uranium bombarded traces of nitrogen in the buried fossils.” Carbon-14 does form from such transformation of nitrogen, but actual calculations demonstrate conclusively this process does not produce the levels of radiocarbon that world-class laboratories have found in fossils, coal, and diamonds.7 holds a Ph D in geology from the University of Sydney and has worked as a consultant research geologist in both Australia and America. Snelling is now director of research at Answers in Genesis.

God’s Word clearly teaches that the earth is young, and the evidence powerfully confirms it.

So don’t miss this issue of Answers, which brings you up to speed on the ten best evidences for a young earth.